No pity for Polanski

 


Published/Last Modified on Friday, October 23, 2009 4:12 AM MDT

The saga of jailed film director Roman Polanski continues — and continues to illustrate the man’s failure to grasp the obvious.

Polanski, of “Rosemary’s Baby” fame, and widower of Manson Family victim Sharon Tate, was convicted in the U.S. of unlawful sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old girl. In 1977. He reportedly gave the girl alcohol and Quaaludes before allegedly raping her.

Given the charges, Polanski got a heckuva deal 32 years ago, when he copped to unlawful sexual intercourse and drew a 90-day prison term (for a psychiatric evaluation).

Advertisement
Released 42 days into his stint by the evaluator, Polanski blew it. The judge ordered Polanski back to jail for the remainder of the term, but the director fled to France instead of returning to court.

France, where the Polish-born Polanski has dual-citizenship, left him alone. The Swiss recently took a different tack, though, jailing the director, to the howls of stunned Hollywood celebs. Tuesday, Polanski lost his bid to be released from Swiss jail while battling extradition to the U.S.

His lawyers whined that Polanski, now 76, would be bankrupted. Seems his legal woes have interrupted his latest film project, and that’s leaving investors in limbo.

The Swiss court’s ruling boiled down to two words, though: Flight. Risk.

We acknowledge Polanski is an artistic genius. We accept the evaluator’s finding three decades back that he is unlikely to ever reoffend. But just because you’re able to run for 30 years does not entitle you to a free pass, let alone allow you to don the mantle of victim.

Polanski’s approach is, frankly, offensive. More than that, it’s absurd. Thirty-some years ago, he fled from what would have been a 48-day sentence. Had he taken his punishment like a man then, neither he nor his investors would have any worries now.
 

¤ Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy before participating in our online community.

Comments

    Tired of Hollywood wrote on Nov 2, 2009 7:34 PM:

    " It is sad that the mighty Hollywood bunch not only think this man should be forgiven they prove once again they only care about themselves and money.
    When are we as one voice quit going to the movies to send them a message? i say lets do it NOW and maybe thye will finally get it that they are JUST entertainers and should keep their mouths shut and do what is right. "


Post a comment


READER COMMENTS 

• Be respectful of others, the writer and the subjects in the story.

• Be relevant. Keep your comments on point. 

• See the guidelines for TalkAbout. Perhaps your comment is best for that community forum, available from the home page, instead of commenting on a particular story.

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. Montrose Press is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in montrosepress.com's reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of the Montrose Press. Montrose Press does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Montrose Press spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

(optional)